chasfh Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Related to our topic: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 32 minutes ago, chasfh said: Related to our topic: it's not *that* unusual. Every athlete in an endurance competition knows what it is to find a sustainable pace a step down from max effort that's going to enable them to win the most in the end. Not to mention if you define "best self" as the most winning overall, than you have to endure to be your 'best' self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 (edited) 19 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: it's not *that* unusual. Every athlete in an endurance competition knows what it is to find a sustainable pace a step down from max effort that's going to enable them to win the most in the end. Not to mention if you define "best self" as the most winning overall, than you have to endure to be your 'best' self. The idea that an athlete would expend just enough energy needed to win the game sounds reasonable on paper. But considering that most professional ballplayers are actively striving to either make the majors, or to keep from getting sent down to the minors, every single pitch adds to a body of work against which he will be judged worthy or unworthy. I don’t see where a Mud Hen pitcher lays up just enough to still be able to win a minor league game, when doing so affects the record he and his career prospects will be judged on. In the end, he is judged on his personal pitching record, not his team’s win-loss record. Edited April 10 by chasfh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 (edited) 34 minutes ago, chasfh said: The idea that an athlete would expend just enough energy needed to win the game sounds reasonable on paper. right. My point just being that max physical effort is not the key in much sports competition. A basketball player doesn't generally hurl the ball at the basket, a successful QB doesn't make every throw at max velo. Baseball is supposed to be a skill game. Any hitter that swings as hard as he can on every pitch or makes every throw in the field at max effort is also going to find himself back in the minors - effort moderated by skill is a core of baseball performance. But somehow the game has allowed itself to evolve to where there is too much performance value in max effort all the time for pitchers as compared to command, sequencing, guile, and other less physically taxing aspects of the art. So it goes back to restructuring the game so that a pitcher that keeps hitters off balance and induces a lot of weak contact and picks his spots to throw gas, can still be just as successful as a pitcher that racks up a lot of K's. Edited April 10 by gehringer_2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motor City Sonics Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 In the book and movie The World According To Garp, Garp and his wife are looking at a potential new house when a small plane, sputtering in the distance descends and crashes in to the side of the house and into an upstairs bedroom. The pilot (alone in plane), apparently uninjured steps out of the plane and politely asks "May I use your phone?". Garp then proclaims "we'll take it!". His stunned wife reacts and Garp says "This house has been pre-disastered, we'll be safe here". Have we, having gone through all the pitching injuries in 2022 and 2023, been "pre-disastered". Seeing all these other pitchers fall, I feel like we already went through it. Doesn't mean we're safe, but feels like we were ahead of the curve on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hongbit Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 1 hour ago, Motor City Sonics said: In the book and movie The World According To Garp, Garp and his wife are looking at a potential new house when a small plane, sputtering in the distance descends and crashes in to the side of the house and into an upstairs bedroom. The pilot (alone in plane), apparently uninjured steps out of the plane and politely asks "May I use your phone?". Garp then proclaims "we'll take it!". His stunned wife reacts and Garp says "This house has been pre-disastered, we'll be safe here". Have we, having gone through all the pitching injuries in 2022 and 2023, been "pre-disastered". Seeing all these other pitchers fall, I feel like we already went through it. Doesn't mean we're safe, but feels like we were ahead of the curve on this one. This seems more like the end to A Prayer For Owen Meany Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casimir Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 I heard this mentioned from Trevor Plouffe (I think) in regards to the baseball. I hadn’t thought of this aspect of “deadening” the baseball, actually taking out the hardness to help the grip. And maybe it’s a well known theory that I just didn’t realize myself. But the grip on the baseball might be contributing to injury as well. The harder the baseball, the tougher it is to grip, the harder a pitcher is going to have hold the baseball. So, following his theory, the pretacked baseball is easier to grip, and should reduce injury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motor City Sonics Posted April 11 Author Share Posted April 11 1 hour ago, casimir said: I heard this mentioned from Trevor Plouffe (I think) in regards to the baseball. I hadn’t thought of this aspect of “deadening” the baseball, actually taking out the hardness to help the grip. And maybe it’s a well known theory that I just didn’t realize myself. But the grip on the baseball might be contributing to injury as well. The harder the baseball, the tougher it is to grip, the harder a pitcher is going to have hold the baseball. So, following his theory, the pretacked baseball is easier to grip, and should reduce injury. I don't understand why they felt the need to mess with the baseball. Seems like they've done it several times too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 3 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said: I don't understand why they felt the need to mess with the baseball. Seems like they've done it several times too. I'll go back to my earlier contention. I'm not sure they necessarily even did anything on purpose, it may just have been natural evolution in the manufacturing process toward greater quality control resulting less variability but at a higher average compression limit still within the spec. The problem is that they got all reactionary about it and refused to admit anything happened because they like the result (HR record chases). So now too many people in league management have staked their credibility on the denial that the baseball changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casimir Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Whatever comes out of this issue, the "fix" ain't happening overnight. That much we can probably all agree upon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 15 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: right. My point just being that max physical effort is not the key in much sports competition. A basketball player doesn't generally hurl the ball at the basket, a successful QB doesn't make every throw at max velo. Baseball is supposed to be a skill game. Any hitter that swings as hard as he can on every pitch or makes every throw in the field at max effort is also going to find himself back in the minors - effort moderated by skill is a core of baseball performance. But somehow the game has allowed itself to evolve to where there is too much performance value in max effort all the time for pitchers as compared to command, sequencing, guile, and other less physically taxing aspects of the art. So it goes back to restructuring the game so that a pitcher that keeps hitters off balance and induces a lot of weak contact and picks his spots to throw gas, can still be just as successful as a pitcher that racks up a lot of K's. Which leads to the $64 question, how does the game get restructured to lead to this? And bonus question, when needs to happen for Baseball to care enough to address it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 10 hours ago, casimir said: I heard this mentioned from Trevor Plouffe (I think) in regards to the baseball. I hadn’t thought of this aspect of “deadening” the baseball, actually taking out the hardness to help the grip. And maybe it’s a well known theory that I just didn’t realize myself. But the grip on the baseball might be contributing to injury as well. The harder the baseball, the tougher it is to grip, the harder a pitcher is going to have hold the baseball. So, following his theory, the pretacked baseball is easier to grip, and should reduce injury. That might help on the one count, although I’m not sure it would help keep balls from flying out of the park, so pitchers would still need max/max effort on every pitch to avoid that outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 22 minutes ago, chasfh said: Which leads to the $64 question, how does the game get restructured to lead to this? And bonus question, when needs to happen for Baseball to care enough to address it? Not being able to insure pitcher contracts and enough teams stuck with guys on the books long term with these injuries. As long as it affects non FA eligible players then owners won't care all that much. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 16 minutes ago, oblong said: Not being able to insure pitcher contracts and enough teams stuck with guys on the books long term with these injuries. As long as it affects non FA eligible players then owners won't care all that much. I wonder what percentage of pitcher contracts are successfully insured? How common was the Strasburg contract situation? That would give us an idea of how far things would have to go to wake up the owners. Maybe that’s one reason hardly anybody was getting super long deals this winter—teams couldn’t get reasonably-priced insurance, so enough of them said no to drive down the market on pitchers and other players with injury history. Not the Dodgers, of course, because they have funny money. And Nola and Hader have both been horses so it was probably easy to insure them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 18 minutes ago, chasfh said: I wonder what percentage of pitcher contracts are successfully insured? How common was the Strasburg contract situation? That would give us an idea of how far things would have to go to wake up the owners. Maybe that’s one reason hardly anybody was getting super long deals this winter—teams couldn’t get reasonably-priced insurance, so enough of them said no to drive down the market on pitchers and other players with injury history. Not the Dodgers, of course, because they have funny money. And Nola and Hader have both been horses so it was probably easy to insure them. I've heard it said that the cost to insure can be prohibitive anyway.... that makes me think not very many get insured. But I have no idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casimir Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 49 minutes ago, oblong said: Not being able to insure pitcher contracts and enough teams stuck with guys on the books long term with these injuries. As long as it affects non FA eligible players then owners won't care all that much. Pitchers are going to be like running backs? Use them up, kick them to the side once they've broken down with newer & cheaper editions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casimir Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Anyone else curious to see what the Oakland city connects look like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Looks like we are quickly closing in on the "and they lived happily ever after" conclusion to the story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveMaroth Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 2 hours ago, LongLiveMaroth said: I understand it's not the point you are making, but if Jackson Jobe were elevated to the majors today, it would not be the four youngest players all named Jackson, since Evan Carter is younger than he. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigeraholic1 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 4 hours ago, casimir said: Anyone else curious to see what the Oakland city connects look like? 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddwert Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Oakland may not be that bad JP Sears has a nono going against the Rangers in the 6th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casimir Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 1 hour ago, Toddwert said: Oakland may not be that bad JP Sears has a nono going against the Rangers in the 6th One hitter over 6 1/3 inning. Got his ERA down to 5.17. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 4 hours ago, oblong said: Better than a tanto in a linen wrapper I suppose... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.