CMRivdogs Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 1 hour ago, oblong said: Can't one of the Secret Service agents do it? They don't work for him. He doesn't sign their checks. The article says there are negotiations with the SS. I think they need to hire a porn star. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted October 27, 2022 Author Share Posted October 27, 2022 Do you believe this? I don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted October 28, 2022 Share Posted October 28, 2022 We've see. This act multiple times before. He talks tough about testifying then never does. I absolutely believe he was talking tough about testifying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben9753 Posted October 28, 2022 Share Posted October 28, 2022 Still waiting for the SS dude to testify under oath against Hutchison 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted October 28, 2022 Author Share Posted October 28, 2022 13 hours ago, ben9753 said: Still waiting for the SS dude to testify under oath against Hutchison The red hats are already convinced and are shoveling their money in Trump's direction, so SS guy doesn't have to testify. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted November 3, 2022 Share Posted November 3, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smr-nj Posted November 3, 2022 Share Posted November 3, 2022 59 minutes ago, pfife said: He’d better have some decent personal security, because I can envision any number of MAGA loyalists (who must recognize the really precarious position DJT finds himself in this evening) taking steps to eliminate any possibility of “loose lips” sinking the S.S. Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romad1 Posted November 3, 2022 Share Posted November 3, 2022 6 minutes ago, smr-nj said: He’d better have some decent personal security, because I can envision any number of MAGA loyalists (who must recognize the really precarious position DJT finds himself in this evening) taking steps to eliminate any possibility of “loose lips” sinking the S.S. Trump. I'd hate for someone to attack him with a hammer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted November 3, 2022 Author Share Posted November 3, 2022 12 hours ago, smr-nj said: He’d better have some decent personal security, because I can envision any number of MAGA loyalists (who must recognize the really precarious position DJT finds himself in this evening) taking steps to eliminate any possibility of “loose lips” sinking the S.S. Trump. Talk about a pretty sweet deal: they could literally shoot the guy dead at high noon on Fifth Avenue and, in the eyes of the Foxified universe, successfully pin it on Antifa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted November 3, 2022 Share Posted November 3, 2022 I saw a reference to a clip of Patel on one of those fringe sites/news channels saying we need to defund the FBI/DOJ. So I'm not sure about his cooperation. Maybe it's one of those things you say one thing on TV and another under oath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewsieg Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 https://www.axios.com/2022/11/04/trump-presidential-run-2024-announcement Wonder if this leaking with help democrats. Republicans have focused the mid-terms on the economy but that means less attention on Trump and by gosh, can't let that happen! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted November 4, 2022 Author Share Posted November 4, 2022 By way of reminder, Trump is an overt litmus test for this campaign. His campaign-stealing is the #1 trait hundreds of candidates are embracing, and they are actively vying for his endorsements by clamoring to show up at his rallies. So please, let’s not pretend he is simply a retired statesman trying to live his life in peace and privacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 On 10/27/2022 at 8:07 PM, pfife said: We've see. This act multiple times before. He talks tough about testifying then never does. I absolutely believe he was talking tough about testifying Talk talk is all he's got. It's his entire schtick. And his followers fall for it every time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted November 7, 2022 Author Share Posted November 7, 2022 On the other hand, it’s not as though Trump talk talk is just a big nothing. It is having dramatic real-work effects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 When he declares he'll lose all RNC legal funding... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romad1 Posted November 7, 2022 Share Posted November 7, 2022 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: When he declares he'll lose all RNC legal funding... He must really think this would stop the indictments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted November 8, 2022 Author Share Posted November 8, 2022 Do we know it won’t? Honest question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romad1 Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 1 hour ago, chasfh said: Do we know it won’t? Honest question. Lawful Good rules-adhering paladins like Merick Garland might just need to meet up with some chaotic good hobbit thieves to do the right thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatkoVarda Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 1 hour ago, chasfh said: Do we know it won’t? Honest question. if there is some stupid memo written decades ago that says presidential candidates cannot be charged with a crime to protect them from politicized DOJ, Garland should literally burn that memo on TV, and proclaim the American people deserve to be protected from criminals 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerbomb13 Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Cowan Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 24 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said: Oh that stings a little bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Cowan Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 So now does Rupert Murdoch tell Tucker Carlson to start mocking Trump and boosting DeSantis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Cowan Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 On 11/3/2022 at 11:31 AM, chasfh said: Talk about a pretty sweet deal: they could literally shoot the guy dead at high noon on Fifth Avenue and, in the eyes of the Foxified universe, successfully pin it on Antifa. So now, less than a week later, is this still true? It seems like now, shooting guys on Fifth Avenue might have some consequences after all. If Rupert Murdoch is giving him a wedgie, how far behind can Fox News be? The time is right for an indictment, right now. No reason to keep stalling. Those riots that were supposed to happen if he was indicted? Protests will happen, but not with enough people to even block a street. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chasfh Posted November 10, 2022 Author Share Posted November 10, 2022 8 hours ago, Jim Cowan said: So now, less than a week later, is this still true? It seems like now, shooting guys on Fifth Avenue might have some consequences after all. If Rupert Murdoch is giving him a wedgie, how far behind can Fox News be? The time is right for an indictment, right now. No reason to keep stalling. Those riots that were supposed to happen if he was indicted? Protests will happen, but not with enough people to even block a street. In the eyes of a Foxified universe? Sure. To the rest of us? Definitely not. The trick lies in who’s got the power to exert their will over the other at a given time. We all want Trump to get indicted months, even years ago. When Merrick Garland does, he better have all his ducks lined up in a perfect little row, because he has exactly one shot to get it exactly right. Because you know what they say: you go after the king, you best not miss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 On 11/8/2022 at 8:02 AM, chasfh said: Do we know it won’t? Honest question. I know we are talking avoid indictments, but in 2016 both candidates were under fbi investigation during the race. I don't recall anyone every saying Hillary couldn't be indicted but she was a Democrat and a woman so the law is probably different for her 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.