Jump to content

2023 NFL Draft Thread


Mr.TaterSalad

Recommended Posts

I think the question is more along the lines of whether Robinson is "special" enough to ignore a general rule that you don't draft RBs in the first round. Similar to the question Kyle Pitts raised two years ago (who I think the Falcons are completely misusing, but that's besides the point).

I don't think there is any question that if Will Anderson or Jalen Carter are there, you take them. The question is more so if you have Robinson graded as a top 5 pick and the best remaining defensive player graded top 15, do you take Robinson and wait to grab one of your top remaining defensive players for the second pick?

If they they think he is going to be Alvin Kamara or Christian McCaffery, you have to strongly consider it. I'm okay with the answer being no though also. I agree that RBs shouldn't usually be taken in the first round, but if that were a blanket rule you wouldn't have drafted Barry. I know it's a different era, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2022 at 9:49 AM, Motown Bombers said:

With the way NFL QBs are protected, I would be more concerned with a short QB being able to see downfield and avoid batted balls. I wonder if Murray or Mayfield have any higher amount of batted balls than other QBs? Drew Brees compensated for his short stature with a high release. 

the conventional wisdom used to be that to compensate for vision and obstacles, shorter guys had more success if they rolled out a lot, but that's tougher to do in todays game with so many edge guys that can run a QB down if comes in their direction - also means a short QB better be fast as well. Size also helps guys fight off sacks or get the ball off before they can be pulled down.

In general, there is probably good reason so many QBs look like Brady.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to get Richardson, he is definitely a risk so I don't think I could take him with our first 2 picks but if he could be had in the late 1st or 2nd I think he would be worth the gamble. I mentioned before but I would love to see how a more mobile QB could do in our offense and they don't get much more mobile than Richardson. I was watching some of the game tonight and there was one play where he seriously pushed the pile like 10 yards, it was freaking insane, never seen a QB do that before so he's deceptively strong as well. 

Edited by RandyMarsh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:

I would love to get Richardson, he is definitely a risk so I don't think I could take him with our first 2 picks but if he could be had in the late 1st or 2nd I think he would be worth the gamble. I mentioned before but I would love to see how a more mobile QB could do in our offense and they don't get much more mobile than Richardson. I was watching some of the game tonight and there was one play where he seriously pushed the pile like 10 yards, it was freaking insane, never seen a QB do that before so he's deceptively strong as well. 

55% completion rate is very poor for a college qb prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, buddha said:

55% completion rate is very poor for a college qb prospect.

That's why there is risk there, completion percentage definitely leaves alot to be desired but he throws a pretty ball, real tight spiral and is uber athletic. You're banking on his accuracy improving in the NFL with better players around him and better schemes to give the receivers more space. At Florida he has been undermanned compared to many of the SEC monsters so perhaps that has hurt his accuracy? I really don't know but IF you take him in the 1st or 2nd you're trusting your scouts and banking on his game translating better in the NFL.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:

That's why there is risk there, completion percentage definitely leaves alot to be desired but he throws a pretty ball, real tight spiral and is uber athletic. You're banking on his accuracy improving in the NFL with better players around him and better schemes to give the receivers more space. At Florida he has been undermanned compared to many of the SEC monsters so perhaps that has hurt his accuracy? I really don't know but IF you take him in the 1st or 2nd you're trusting your scouts and banking on his game translating better in the NFL.  

he's very athletic, that's for sure.  a lot of the passes he throws look good, but then you see just the complete terrible ones thrown to no one.  i dont know enough about football to know of he's doing a good job finding receivers downfield or going through his progressions.

will levis, for all his flaws, also plays in the sec with undermanned receovers amd has a 67% completion rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course look at JJ at Michigan. He was leading the world in completion % as long as they were running a short passing ball control air game. Once they tried to start stretching the field and throwing over the D, his % plummetted. Same QB, same receivers. Tougher opposition probably also , but mostly just the change in game planning. So it's a number that's going to have a little context to it.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:

I'm not real privy to football analytics because most sites are behind a paywall but yeah I'm sure there are stats out there that are more telling of a QBs real accuracy than completion percentage and probably what teams put more stock in than that. 

I'm assuming analytics such as completion percentage by area (0-15 yards left, center, right; 15-30 yards, same, 30+ yards, same...) are available to teams. Or at least I hope they would be and the Lions look at stuff like that...

Also can probably find that out in workouts to some degree (ability to be accurate the deeper the throw goes...).

Didn't several QB prospects last year drop precipitously AFTER teams started doing workouts with all of the QB's...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason_R said:

Josh Allen: 56.2% completion for his college career. 

YMMV

that's the exception.  other than him, almost no qb has been successful with that low of a completion percentage in college.

buy the game is changing and more qbs are running now.  richardson can certainly do that.

richardson looks like a bigger malik willis.  and he fell to round 3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stafford was 52% and 55% respectively his first 2 seasons in college before jumping to 61% his junior year, this is essentially Richardson's first full year at QB so you're banking on him progressing with more experience. Again though he is a risk and is definitely raw but his upside is as high as any QB in the draft, definitely a player that you have to trust what your scouts see and project in him if you're going to take him before the 3rd round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      253
    • Most Online
      186

    Newest Member
    maxDC
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...