mtutiger Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 8 minutes ago, Archie said: Yes, Joe's comment on siding with Taiwan was interesting to say the least. Psaki had to back track on that the next day. They have to be careful letting Joe out and talking in public like this or he's going to get us into a war. I wonder if Gen. Milley had to call his Chinese pals and tell them all is good and that our President got off his leash and didn't know what he said. I've cared for relatives with dementia and Alzheimer's. Its a terrible thing. I obviously don't know if Biden has Alzheimer's but he is showing signs of moderate dementia. Anderson Cooper had to help him finish some of his sentences and guide him along last week. I figure if Reagan was able to finish his second term they will get Biden through his term. I think even the democrats prefer that as opposed to Harris taking over. Just checking, where did you get your MD again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ronz Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 "Safe and secure elections" is not and never was a thing until Trump. This is how many times the phrase "safe and secure elections" was used in newspapers across the country. Source: Newspapers.com 1776 - 1829 - Unknown 1830's - 1 1840 - 1879 - 0 1880's - 1 1890's - 1 1900's - 3 1910's - 2 1920 - 1939 - 0 1940's - 2 1950's - 0 1960's - 1 1970's - 1 1980's - 0 1990's - 2 2000's - 91 2010 - 60 2020 - 2021 - 312 Wonder what changed in 2020? 🙄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Cowan Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 "The country was safer because people were not allowed in from terrorist countries" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 2 hours ago, Archie said: There wear several poll workers that claimed signatures weren't matched. There were poll watchers that weren't allowed in counting rooms during the count. That should concern everyone. I was at the Capitol in Lansing for the Right to Work protest. Were you there? It was quite entertaining. I very happy RTW was enacted for the Michigan workers. Its the best thing that could happen for them and the only thing that protects them from corrupt unions. I have also attended county democrat party meetings and even the state convention several times. Have you been to either of those? I used to work for a union that required we attend these functions. I even got to vote. In a county meeting they are still looking for the person who wrote in Ted Nugent on one of the ballots. I confess. “Claimed”. That’s not fact. People can claim lots of things. Yes the poll watchers were not allowed in because they were already an excessive amount of other poll watchers already in there. This bullshit was already hashed out as complete nonsense by the court system. This is the best you got? It’s weak. You and Rudy and the stripper, errrr Escort that was an election IT worker, errr, I mean an election screen glass wiper person, can go find an audience of gullibles because the courts said you all are full of shit and lawyers are in trouble over it. Pick better battles. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 1 hour ago, The Ronz said: "Safe and secure elections" is not and never was a thing until Trump. This is how many times the phrase "safe and secure elections" was used in newspapers across the country. Source: Newspapers.com 1776 - 1829 - Unknown 1830's - 1 1840 - 1879 - 0 1880's - 1 1890's - 1 1900's - 3 1910's - 2 1920 - 1939 - 0 1940's - 2 1950's - 0 1960's - 1 1970's - 1 1980's - 0 1990's - 2 2000's - 91 2010 - 60 2020 - 2021 - 312 Wonder what changed in 2020? 🙄 What changed in 2020? Voting rules were changed to accommodate Covid lockdowns . Now democrats want to change the rules so people can vote without photo ID and have mail in ballots with no controls. Their campaign motto for 2022 is "Vote Early and Vote Often." 😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ronz Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 I have never been asked for a photo ID to vote. Have you? Mail in ballots have been around for years. You do know that Trump votes by a mail in ballot right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtutiger Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 (edited) 58 minutes ago, oblong said: “Claimed”. That’s not fact. People can claim lots of things. Yes the poll watchers were not allowed in because they were already an excessive amount of other poll watchers already in there. This bullshit was already hashed out as complete nonsense by the court system. This is the best you got? It’s weak. You and Rudy and the stripper, errrr Escort that was an election IT worker, errr, I mean an election screen glass wiper person, can go find an audience of gullibles because the courts said you all are full of shit and lawyers are in trouble over it. Pick better battles. There were upwards of 50 lawsuits, along with numerous recounts and audits that have been completed since this last election. And they have all not found any evidence of widespread voter fraud or irregularities. It's inconvenient for some, I get that some folks are starting from a conclusion and working backward instead of the other way around. But that's just reality Edited October 23, 2021 by mtutiger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 This was one that got the gang riled up. But of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 39 minutes ago, Archie said: What changed in 2020? Voting rules were changed to accommodate Covid lockdowns . Now democrats want to change the rules so people can vote without photo ID and have mail in ballots with no controls. Their campaign motto for 2022 is "Vote Early and Vote Often." 😁 And in states like Pennsylvania it was the Republican legislature who changed the rules to allow more people to vote by absentee ballot by mail before the pandemic. In Michigan, the voters approved the expansion in voting by mail prior to March of 2020. Do some research. Don’t depend on your fake news sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: And in states like Pennsylvania it was the Republican legislature who changed the rules to allow more people to vote by absentee ballot by mail before the pandemic. In Michigan, the voters approved the expansion in voting by mail prior to March of 2020. Do some research. Don’t depend on your fake news sources. https://ballotpedia.org/Michigan_Proposal_3,_Voting_Policies_in_State_Constitution_Initiative_(2018) http://www.pahousegop.com/electionreform Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 32 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: https://ballotpedia.org/Michigan_Proposal_3,_Voting_Policies_in_State_Constitution_Initiative_(2018) http://www.pahousegop.com/electionreform Quit bringing facts into it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motown Bombers Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 (edited) Republicans always used vote by mail more than Democrats. It didn't become an issue for Republicans until inner city Democrats started using it. Edited October 23, 2021 by Motown Bombers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfife Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 4 hours ago, Archie said: There wear several poll workers that claimed signatures weren't matched. There were poll watchers that weren't allowed in counting rooms during the count. That should concern everyone. I was at the Capitol in Lansing for the Right to Work protest. Were you there? It was quite entertaining. I very happy RTW was enacted for the Michigan workers. Its the best thing that could happen for them and the only thing that protects them from corrupt unions. I have also attended county democrat party meetings and even the state convention several times. Have you been to either of those? I used to work for a union that required we attend these functions. I even got to vote. In a county meeting they are still looking for the person who wrote in Ted Nugent on one of the ballots. I confess. happy about right to work, pissed when companies fire people based on the rights given to them under the right to work legislation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 2 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: And in states like Pennsylvania it was the Republican legislature who changed the rules to allow more people to vote by absentee ballot by mail before the pandemic. In Michigan, the voters approved the expansion in voting by mail prior to March of 2020. Do some research. Don’t depend on your fake news sources. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/ Why don't you do some research! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 Best you can do. A ruling from a partisan hack appointed by a hack of a politician Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRivdogs Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 BTW, loved your Union story. Glad to know your taking advantage of benefits without having to do any heavy lifting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: BTW, loved your Union story. Glad to know your taking advantage of benefits without having to do any heavy lifting Don't worry I more than earn my pay. I took the job to work with the membership and assist them, not a political party. There were a few conservatives or Republicans that I worked with. We had fun with political crap they wanted us to do. I learned a lot about politics and the democrats in particular. They are a very power hungry group. One time at the state convention Debby Stabusnow brought a high school band with her. Anytime she got up and moved, they followed her playing. It was embarrassing to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: Best you can do. A ruling from a partisan hack appointed by a hack of a politician Sorry about facts getting in the way of your story. Its the legal proof you wanted that you didn't bother to look for or know about. If he's a partisan hack then I would assume you think every judge thats been appointed, and there are a lot of them, are all partisan hacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Archie said: Don't worry I more than earn my pay. I took the job to work with the membership and assist them, not a political party. There were a few conservatives or Republicans that I worked with. We had fun with political crap they wanted us to do. I learned a lot about politics and the democrats in particular. They are a very power hungry group. One time at the state convention Debby Stabusnow brought a high school band with her. Anytime she got up and moved, they followed her playing. It was embarrassing to watch. Political parties are power hungry! Who knew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 The ruling wasn’t about the law itself but rather the procedure. from the article: But Genetski did not allege that Benson's directive "caused him to accept a signature that he believed was invalid," according to Murray's decision. The judge didn't rule on whether Benson's directive violated state election law, but did say the directive violated the Administrative Procedures Act, the process that must be followed when an agency creates new rules. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 I don't follow politics as much as most people here do, but there were dozens of lawsuits from November through December and they were all denied. Even the Trump selected Supreme Court rejected them. There's nothing there. The vote went through all the processes according to the constitution and they found nothing. Trump was just too immature to admit that he lost the election and now he's making millions off his fake protests. And all his supporters have fallen for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 Can you imagine what would happen if a court invaldated the election? It would be chaos and war in the streets. I don't think anybody would take that responsibility for starting that. It would be a no win situation so it was best to do nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 43 minutes ago, Archie said: Can you imagine what would happen if a court invaldated the election? It would be chaos and war in the streets. I don't think anybody would take that responsibility for starting that. It would be a no win situation so it was best to do nothing. ROTFLMAO - tell that to the Scotus members that voted Bush V Gore! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 13 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: ROTFLMAO - tell that to the Scotus members that voted Bush V Gore! They didn't overturn the results of an election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted October 24, 2021 Share Posted October 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Archie said: Can you imagine what would happen if a court invaldated the election? It would be chaos and war in the streets. I don't think anybody would take that responsibility for starting that. It would be a no win situation so it was best to do nothing. Oh… do that’s the reason. Not that the claims were invalid. You didn’t move the goalposts you took them down. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.